Once the inconsistent condom play with with casual lovers was of this number from almost every other sexual people (Matser ainsi que al

Manage details

Sociodemographic control variables was in fact examined at the baseline: years, data website, knowledge, employment updates, relationship standing, and you will monthly earnings. , 2014), i and additionally regulated having level of have a peek at this web site people previously 6 weeks when conducting analyses with these contradictory condom explore mainly based adjustable.

Process

Every professionals offered told authored say yes to be involved in for each parts regarding the research study. All the study tips and standards was basically approved by the Institutional Comment Chat rooms in the College or university away from Illinois in the il, the brand new College from North carolina within Chapel Hill, in addition to Instituto Dominicano de Dermatologia y Cirugia de- los angeles Piel Dr. Heriberto Bogaert within the Santo Domingo, DR.

Analyses

I introduce descriptive statistics for every of one’s sociodemographic parameters, GRC/S scale, and you may built parameters. For every single of around three oriented details, i conducted bivariate logistic regression toward standardized GRC/S score as the separate adjustable. We report unadjusted chances rates (OR) and you can 95% rely on durations of these bivariate analyses. Subsequently, we conducted multivariate logistic regression for each oriented changeable having standardized GRC/S score and the full band of controls. Of these analyses, i declaration modified opportunity rates (AOR) and you can 95% believe intervals (CI). All the analyses stated less than have been conducted for the SAS variation 9.cuatro.

Efficiency

Group qualities get inside Desk 1 . Very people was indeed in ages of 31 (median: 26; range: 18-41) and you may a majority (69%) got at the least a highschool training. Seventy-about three per cent of males have been working (often formal or informal labor field), 11% was unemployed, and you can 16% had been people. Just 8% earned more twenty five,one hundred thousand Dominican Pesos (DOP) in the past week, in the 625 You.S. dollars (USD). Nineteen % won less than a lot of DOP (25 USD) together with remaining males (72%) attained between one thousand DOP and 25,100000 DOP. 1 / 2 of the new boys reported getting single but got someone, 14% was partnered, and you will 35% was solitary without regular spouse.

I measured about three intimate risk behavior ( Table step one ). Thirty-1 percent of males reported with several couples inside for the past 30 days. Of men you to definitely claimed with a low-constant spouse in the earlier in the day 6 months (n = 194), 43% said contradictory condom have fun with which have low-steady partners in earlier times 6 months. When people claimed on past big date that they had sex, 21% said that they were having a drink.

Ahead of standardizing, new GRC/S scale got a hateful away from 18.2 (range: 3–34) and good SD of 5.eight ( Desk 2 ). Select Table dos for everybody size affairs.

When investigations this new bivariate contacts ranging from for every sexual chance choices and you may men’s room GRC/S score, i discovered matchmaking regarding the requested recommendations ( Desk 3 ). Particularly, men who’d a higher GRC/S get got higher odds of revealing for each intimate choices. Two of the sexual practices–having two or more partners before thirty day period, and you will drinking alcohol at last sex – was in fact notably regarding the with a greater GRC/S. The latest bivariate relationship ranging from inconsistent the means to access condoms which have non-steady partners and you may GRC/S wasn’t extreme.

Immediately following handling for sociodemographic features ( Desk 3 ), highest GRC/S was somewhat of improved likelihood of having a few or alot more partners in past times 30 days (AOR: 1.33, 95% count on interval [CI]: step 1.0step one-1.74), inconsistent condom explore having low-constant lovers (AOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-dos.01), and you may drinking alcohol for once sex (AOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13-2.17).

Talk

Our study provided help on the relationship anywhere between GRC/S and you may men’s room sexual chance habits, including amount of intimate couples, inconsistent condom play with having non-steady people, and you can alcohol consumption for once sex.